[m-rev.] for review: define <<u and >>u

[Julien Fischer]

On Wed, 7 Dec 2022, Zoltan Somogyi wrote:

> On Tue, 06 Dec 2022 01:11:07 +1100 (AEDT), "Zoltan Somogyi" <zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com> wrote:
>> Since this diff requires the installed compiler to recognize <<u and >>u
>> as operators, I won't commit this until an rotd contains the both
>> the change that enables that, and the new synonym for
>> compiler-sufficiently-recent that I just added to options.m in order to allow
>> configure to test for that. This won't be before wednesday.
>
> The last rotd contains the change to the lexer that this diff
> requires to be present in the installed compiler, so I would like to
> commit this diff once the proposed change to NEWS below
> has been reviewed.

The changes to the NEWS file are fine.

> Does anyone want me to wait?

You can go ahead.

Julien.